2097: Dungeon Travelers 2: Some Initial Impressions

Dungeon Travelers 2 came out on PlayStation Vita yesterday. To say I've been eagerly anticipating this game is something of an understatement; I've been deliberately holding off playing anything else "big" until it came out, because I was keen to be able to devote some time to it. And, after a good few hours with it today, I'm not at all disappointed with my decision to do so.

For the unfamiliar, Dungeon Travelers 2 is a first-person perspective dungeon crawler RPG (of the Wizardry mould that Japan loves so) created as a collaborative effort between visual novel producers Aquaplus, weird-but-cool RPG specialists Sting and That Company People Mostly Know The Name Of Because of Persona, Atlus. It has a somewhat convoluted history: its Japan-only predecessor Dungeon Travelers was a fleshed-out remake of a dungeon crawler that was part of a fandisc for Aquaplus' visual novel ToHeart 2, though Dungeon Travelers 2 itself doesn't have anything to do with either the first game or ToHeart 2, simply sharing some aesthetic sensibilities and mechanics.

Dungeon Travelers 2 shot to notoriety a few months back when Polygon's Phil Kollar berated publisher Atlus for localising the game, which he referred to as a "creepy, porn-lite dungeon crawler". I responded in some detail to Kollar's nonsense back when he first blurted it out over at MoeGamer; take a look. Ironically, Kollar's condemnation of the game actually made a lot of people — me included — who had never heard of it before aware of its existence, and I can't help feeling that the game has been a bigger success than it probably would have been if he'd just kept his mouth shut. In that sense, I'm not complaining; it's just a little frustrating to know that he almost certainly won't have given it any time and attention since that initial piece, having written it off as the usual pervy nonsense.

Dungeon Travelers 2 is an ecchi game, though, make no mistake, if you hadn't already noticed from the artwork that peppers this post; within five minutes of starting the first dungeon, you're presented with a rather fetching view of one of the heroines' panties-clad buttocks, and every boss fight is followed by some rather beautifully drawn artwork of said boss in a somewhat disheveled, suggestive state. Not only that, but the vast majority of enemies are scantily clad cute female characters (the rest are, inexplicably, sentient fruit) that draw a certain degree of inspiration from the popular "monster girl" aesthetic, albeit in a less overt way than something like the anime Monster Musume.

Here's the thing, though; the ecchi content of Dungeon Travelers 2 works because, like other games that fully embrace their ecchi (or even hentai) side, it's consistent in its use and it thus becomes part of the overall aesthetic. It's a sexy game; it's not about sex as such, mind you, but beautiful girls in sexy poses are very much part of the way it looks, and it is not at all ashamed of that fact. In order to fully enjoy it, you absolutely can't be ashamed of it, either.

But the ecchi content is the least interesting thing to talk about when it comes to Dungeon Travelers 2, because it's a really solid game with some interesting mechanics. Of particular note is the game's approach to teaching you how to play; the electronic manual provided with the software gives you only a bare-bones outline of the interface, but through a combination of in-game lectures (delivered by the deliciously sarcastic Maid-Sensei) and in-context, in-character sub-events that are triggered by your various actions in the dungeon and in battle, the game teaches you how to play and things to watch out for without resorting to insulting your intelligence. Maid-Sensei's lectures are the nearest thing to an outright tutorial, but those are skippable; the sub-events, meanwhile, are short, snappy, humorous and get their point across without being dull.

There are some interesting systems at play. The concept of the game revolves around "Libras", who are individuals that are able to seal away monsters in books. The protagonist character is one of these Libras, but he doesn't take an active role in battle; instead, the game is presented as you, playing the role of Fried the Libra, issuing orders to your gradually expanding party of pretty girl bodyguards and performing the important task of sealing away the monsters when they've been defeated.

It doesn't stop there, though; the Libra concept is a core system of the game. By defeating enough monsters, you can create "Sealbooks" which have two main functions: firstly, they represent the fact that you have researched the monster sufficiently to understand their behaviour and characteristics, depicted in game as revealing their full stats, and secondly, they can be used as a piece of equipment, with each individual monster's Sealbook having a different special effect. Thanks to a "completion percentage" figure in the game, there's a definite element of "gotta catch 'em all" going on that I anticipate is going to cause me some issues in the future.

Alongside this is a detailed class system for all your party members, with each character able to level up a number of different classes and learn skills using earned skill points. It's possible to build and specialise characters in a variety of different ways, and the early game introduces you to a selection of interesting classes, beginning with a fairly straightforward tank and DPS combo — pleasingly, the tank class is able to provoke enemies and increase the likelihood that they'll be hit in favour of squishy mages — before giving you the peculiar "Spieler" class, which so far appears to be heavily based on luck and random chance, and the "Maid" class, which plays a supportive role that is very distinct from a dedicated healer by buffing and allowing characters to restore the points they use on skills as well as their all-important HP.

I'm not particularly deep into the game as yet, so the dungeons haven't got especially complicated so far. There have already been some challenging fights, though, and the game is not afraid to slap you about a bit until you remember that you have to play dungeon crawlers a little differently to more conventional RPGs. I got a Game Over in the third fight I had in the whole game, for example, because I overextended myself and forgot that it's perfectly acceptable in this type of game to advance a bit then run screaming for the exit to lick your wounds and restock; compare and contrast to your more typical JRPG, meanwhile, in which you tend to always be moving forwards rather than backtracking or making multiple expeditions.

In fact, what Dungeon Travelers 2 reminded me of, of all things, is a board game of the Advanced Heroquest ilk. The basic structure is the same: get overarching quest, go into dungeon, come back out if things get hairy, go back in, find treasure, go back out, resupply, go back in, fight a bit further… and so on. The "multiple expeditions" nature of exploration in the game is inherently satisfying, since you can easily see on the convenient automap when you're making progress, because you'll be revealing new areas. Discovering new monsters is enjoyable, too, since they're all depicted with some truly lovely artwork, and the juxtaposition between the "pretty girl" monsters and the "sentient fruit" monsters is bizarre and hilarious.

I'm enjoying it a great deal so far, then, and I'm looking forward to spending a lot of time with it. I'm a relative newbie to the dungeon crawler subgenre of RPGs as a whole, but between Demon Gaze (which was my first real hardcore dungeon-crawling experience) and what I've experienced of this so far, I'm very much a believer already.

To the dungeons, then, where pretty girls await!

2096: Sod Off, McIntosh

I have, to date, resisted taking the bait of the one and only Jonathan McIntosh, the complete tool who is responsible for the majority of the garbage that Anita Sarkeesian spouts on a regular basis, but witnessing his whining today that tabletop gaming is heavily steeped in colonial themes and mechanics, and that this leads to it being an overwhelmingly white hobby — this somehow being a bad thing, even if it were true (which I somehow doubt, since he failed to show any actual data to back up his assertion) — just proved to be a little too much for me. First he attacks video games; now, it seems, he's starting on other forms of entertainment, too.

I honestly pity him a little bit. I don't really understand what could have possibly happened in his life to make him such a malodorous thundercunt, but it can't be a particularly pleasant life looking at the world through such an utterly joyless lens. Video games and tabletop games — not to mention all the other forms of entertainment media he's doubtless had a pop at — are designed to bring joy to people, and in the latter case in particular, they're designed to bring people closer together to share an experience in a face-to-face, social environment.

I'm not denying that there are plenty of games — particularly of European origin — that have colonial themes. But the reason for this is not anything to do with living out white supremacy fantasies or anything like that; it just so happens that the very concept of building up a civilisation or colonising an unexplored land makes for compelling, competitive gameplay.

And McIntosh's assertion that the heavy use of colonial themes leads to it being a white hobby is absurd, anyhow; tabletop gaming is one of the most inclusive hobbies in the world. Thanks to its heavy reliance on abstract rather than literal representations, you can imagine whatever you like unfolding on the board in front of you. Who's to say that the colonists in The Settlers of Catan are white, since you never see them? The meeples of Carcassonne have neither gender nor race. Agricola features a completely egalitarian society where both men and women do their part for the greater good as much as each other. Terra Mystica's "human" characters are of a variety of ethnic origins. (Sorry, they're "People of Colour"; God, I fucking hate that obnoxious phrase.)

Not only that, but his assertion that there are a "staggering number" of board games that focus on colonialism is likewise absurd. Looking over at my game shelf, it's clear that this is just plain bollocks. Just on the top part of my shelf, I have a game based around King Arthur and the Knights of the Round Table; one about medieval monks solving a murder; another about 1920s high society solving a murder on a train; another about Egyptians building a palace for Cleopatra; another about Middle Eastern-inspired nomads attempting to take control of a desert region and the genies that live there; one about driving cars very fast; one about the whole world coming together to fend off an alien invasion; and a dungeon crawler whose main character is a dark-skinned elf.

So fuck the fuck off, Jonathan McIntosh. Your views are utterly poisonous to the sanity of people who just want to enjoy their hobbies. If these things bother you so much, then perhaps you should find something more enjoyable to do with your time. Go and help starving children in Africa or something if you really want to make the world a better place. But no; that would involve getting off your pasty white arse and actually doing something rather than indulging in constant armchair slacktivism on the Internet, wouldn't it? And we couldn't possibly have that; far better to keep scripting nonsense for that pet hoop-eared cretin of yours to keep regurgitating just as everyone is starting to forget about you and enjoy the things they love again.

Get some joy in your life. And allow those of us who already have some joy in our life to enjoy it in peace, you absolute bellend.

I thank you.

2095: Exploring Space

I'm starting to get a bit interested in Elite Dangerous after chatting about it with a friend the other night. It sounds like the ongoing, active development of the game is starting to pay off a bit with some actual Stuff to Do, albeit Stuff that gets a bit repetitive after a while, from what I understand. There's a great deal of potential there, however, and with the status of Star Citizen a little uncertain, Elite Dangerous is starting to look a little more like the "safe" choice for next-gen space opera action.

I'm a little loathe to pay full price for Elite Dangerous at this point, however, since the thing I'm particularly interested in — the Horizons expansion, which adds planetary landings to the mix — costs about the same as the base game of Elite Dangerous and, in fact, comes with a copy of Elite Dangerous included, too, meaning that if you want to play Elite Dangerous now and enjoy Horizons when it comes out, you effectively have to pay for it twice, which is a bit poo, but that's not what I'm going to get into today.

Anyway. The point is, while I was looking at Elite Dangerous and willing the price to magically drop by itself, I spotted some "related" games on Steam that looked intriguing. One in particular caught my eye: Rodina. I became even more interested in this after reading a user review that compared it favourably to 16-bit classics Starglider and Damocles, so I decided to check out the free demo this evening.

Rodina is a game that prides itself on seamless exploration. And for once, that isn't an exaggeration: you start the game on foot on an asteroid, follow a signal to find your spaceship, hop into your spaceship, wander around inside your spaceship, take off, fly around the asteroid, find some bits to make your spaceship better, take off again, leave the asteroid, start flying around the solar system and start investigating planets for a mysterious alien menace that appears to have thwarted humanity's attempts to colonise the stars.

Rodina is technically in Early Access at the moment, but it is possible to "finish" it already, apparently, by seeing through the whole story. The story is primarily told through text boxes that appear through a combination of messages you receive on your ship's communication system and data crystals you find scattered around on the various stellar bodies around the solar system. It's an intriguing little tale with some good writing, though seeing interactions between people depicted through this rather cold medium makes the game itself feel like a rather lonely experience — doubtless intentional.

The premise is intriguing enough, to be sure. The execution… well, it's difficult to make a fully informed judgement based on just an hour of the demo — take note, Mike Diver of Vice and your atrocious Senran Kagura 2 review, no I haven't forgotten about you — but I have mixed feelings so far. On the one hand, it's cool to see a game with such a great sense of scale; the solar system in which the game unfolds feels big, and stellar bodies feel like more than bitmaps you fly towards until they suddenly, magically become a 3D planet surface. There's a cool atmospheric re-entry system where you have to wrestle with your ship's controls as you descend, and successfully popping out of the bottom of this is always a satisfying moment.

Trouble is, like many games of this type, the scenery is a little bit bland, or at least it has been in what I've seen so far. Everything, be it planet or asteroid, appears to be variations on "coloured ground with procedurally generated mountains"; there aren't any real geographical features to speak of, so don't expect something like No Man's Sky from this. This takes a little bit of the fun out of the exploration; a key part of space exploration simulators — and what I'm hoping Elite Dangerous: Horizons will nail later in the year — is allowing you to discover all manner of weird and wonderful things around the galaxy. Rodina has plenty of things to discover, for sure, but for one thing, they're all signposted with waypoints when you get close enough, and secondly, everything I've discovered so far has been nothing more than a few randomly scattered crates and barrels and one or two data crystals. While the story these apparent crash sites was revealing was interesting, by the end of the demo it was already starting to get a little bit tiresome to track down these logs.

There's a lot of potential, for sure, and just as I was finishing the demo, the game was starting to open up a bit, suggesting that I travel to the actual planets in the system to deal with the alien menace rather than just finding log after log. It sounds as if at the present time, there aren't really any friendly NPCs to interact with, which is a shame, but it's something the developer intends to include in the future.

I'm not sure I liked the demo enough to want to drop 11 quid on the full game just yet, but it's certainly an intriguing little game with a great deal of potential that I'll probably keep my eye on to see how it develops. I'm all for more space games, since we've been deprived of them for a good few years; hopefully this is the beginning of a renaissance.

2093: Pondering Crowdfunding

I've gone back and forth in my opinions on crowdfunding a little, but after seeing a number of people spilling a bunch of salt yesterday over nothing more than a rumour that Square Enix might be looking into the possibility of using it to bring more niche, "unlikely" titles over from Japan to the West, a bit of reflection has convinced me that, on the whole, I'm in favour of it.

It is important to accept, however, that there have been a number of crowdfunding fuckups over the years — and, more importantly, a number of high-profile projects that have so far failed to live up to their potential or deliver what was originally promised. Anita "I Hate Fun" Sarkeesian's Tropes vs. Women YouTube series (which I seriously regret chipping in even $5 towards, feeling the way I do about the social justice crowd these days) is several years behind schedule; Keiji Inafune's Mega Man successor Mighty No. 9 has been delayed several times and has had a number of setbacks along the way; Chris Robers' Star Citizen is in a state where no-one seems to quite know what's going on with it and if we're ever going to see it at all, despite it being the most crowdfunded thing in history.

All of these projects still arguably have time to redeem themselves if the finished product comes out worthwhile (fuck Sarkeesian, mind, the joyless hoop-eared twat) but it's understandable that issues like this have caused some people to view crowdfunding with a certain degree of trepidation.

But then at the other end of the spectrum — and here's where my overall positive attitude towards it comes in — there are the success stories. Ambitious visual novels that people once believed would never see a Western release are being localised, for example — the Grisaia trilogy saw its first release a few months back, with the second installment's translation nearing completion; Clannad is coming along soon; and Muv-Luv's Kickstarter is a hair's breadth away from its final stretch goal — and crowdfunding has proven to be an effective means for people to demonstrate that yes, they really want to see things like a new 2D Castlevania (in everything but name), a third installment in the Shenmue series, or the return of early '00s-style isometric role-playing games. Without crowdfunding, none of these things would have happened, because the (understandably) risk-averse games industry as it exists in 2015 would have a tough time convincing shareholders and the like that yes, it really would be a good investment of time and budget to put together something along the same lines as a game released 15 years ago.

One of the most common arguments I see against someone like Square Enix dipping their toes into these waters is that "they have enough money already; why do they need us to give them our money up-front?" Well, for exactly the reasons just mentioned: game companies are, like it or not, a business first and foremost — though they may be staffed by artistic, creative types — and as such, they need to know that any project they undertake is going to be worthwhile for them. Crowdfunding is a means of not only gauging interest in a potential project — with little to no risk if the desired target isn't reached — but also generating some initial operating funds to get it underway. Some projects run over budget, of course, while others are specifically designed with additional funding sources in mind — Shenmue III springs to mind in this instance, for example — and others still, like Star Citizen and Broken Age, end up with a whole lot more money than they originally expected and have to make some tough decisions on how that money is to be spent. The point stands, though; crowdfunding is an easy way to demonstrate that yes, there is an audience for this sort of thing, here's a rough estimate of how big that audience is, here's what we might be able to do for them.

Crowdfunding also taps into an important development in modern society: social media, and the effect this has had on the concept of "word of mouth". I wrote a while back about how the Kickstarter for Muv-Luv comfortably achieved its initial funding goal entirely through word of "mouth" (with "mouth" in this instance also covering "keyboard fingers"), without a peep from the mainstream press — though Kotaku, to their credit (there's something you won't hear me say all that often) did eventually put up a story about it a few days later. We're no longer in an age where new products are dependent on the press to get noticed and promoted; there are plenty of creative works out there across all media now that don't have any column inches — be they print or virtual — devoted to them but are still regarded with love by their fans.

So I don't necessarily think that Square Enix delving into crowdfunding is particularly greedy. They're a business — and a big one, at that — who need to ensure that they're going to be able to make money on any projects they undertake, particularly as they've become a bit more cautious in the last couple of years after a few big-budget failures. Something like RPG series that have traditionally sold quite poorly in the West (hello, Dragon Quest) don't represent a particularly good return on investment for them to just do out of the goodness of their hearts, whereas if fans can show their support for such projects financially up-front, Square Enix is more likely to sell more copies and fans are more likely to get things that they previously thought they'd never be able to enjoy if they were leaving things entirely to the Men In Suits.

As such, if Square Enix decides to jump into the crowdfunding arena, I say good on them. If it means we get games that we wouldn't get otherwise, I am all for it. The traditional model is no longer the only way of funding and buying games, and we should embrace new ways of showing our support for the things that we want to see rather than pissing and moaning about the inevitably drab nature of commercially "safe" products. There's always going to be dull-as-dishwater commercially viable megahits; they're never going to go away, not with the size of the industry as it is today. But what we do have some control over is the smaller end of the market: the niche interest titles that have the most passionate fans in the world; the games that have enthusiasts who will do anything to play a new installment in their favourite series; the games who have fans that are willing to put their money where their mouth is and show that little projects matter, too.

The end result is a more interesting, colourful and diverse games industry; the alternative is a situation where we're subjected to nothing but Call of Duty, Assassin's Creed and Forza Motorsport until the end of time. And while all of those games are good, if that's all there was to play, I wouldn't be nearly as interested in and excited by gaming as I am today. So if a way to support alternatives presents itself, I'm going to take it; you should think about it, too.

2092: I Can Have a Darkside If You Want Me To

I decided that I was going to get over my "rut" with Final Fantasy XIV today and get my mojo back, so I booted it up and decided to try something I hadn't done before: give Dark Knight a go.

Dark Knight is the new tanking class that was added in the Heavensward expansion. So far, I've levelled Paladin (the main "defense tank") to 60 as my main, and I have Warrior (the main "wallopy tank") at 50, so I have a reasonable understanding of it. Dark Knight was a bit of a mystery, though; although I'd read a bit about it, I didn't really have a bead on how it might actually feel to play it.

Turns out it feels like a hell of a lot of fun — far more so than the rather weedy-but-graceful-feeling Paladin, and, for my money, also more so than the cumbersome swings and heavy hits of Warrior.

I've only levelled fro 30-34 so far (you start Dark Knight at 30, unlike pre-expansion classes, which start at 1) so I don't have a huge amount of experience as yet, but I've enjoyed what I've done. The class feels like a good balance between the relatively straightforward, set combos and defense of Paladin and the more intricate combos and damage-buffing of Warrior. There also seems to be a bit more in the way of "stance-dancing", since there are a number of abilities that only work when you have a specific status effect active — or in some cases, if you don't have it active. The skill "Blood Weapon", for example, which increases your attack speed and allows you to drain MP from enemies, will not work if you're in the defensive "Grit" stance, but that's fine, since Blood Weapon is an offensive skill and Grit carries a hefty damage penalty, so the two aren't really compatible.

I like this way of playing; rather than Paladin's approach of sticking with Shield Oath most of the time and giving it a bit of Sword Oath only when you have a hefty aggro lead on the rest of your party, Dark Knight allows you to switch back and forth a lot more freely, giving combat a much more dynamic feel. The rhythm I was getting into by the end of tonight's session saw me doing my basic aggro combo, weaving in the "Low Blow" stunning kick (which is off the global cooldown) and also dropping in the off-GCD "Reprisal" proc to reduce enemy damage after a successful parry. Then, when Blood Weapon was up — it actually has a pretty short cooldown — I'd drop Grit, hit Blood Weapon, unleash as many attacks as I could manage — including DRK's DoT, which, unlike PLD's, isn't part of a combo, so can be applied immediately — before switching back into Grit again once Blood Weapon dropped. The timing of Blood Weapon's cooldown usually meant that I could rotate defensive cooldowns at the same time as throwing up Blood Weapon, too, so I could mitigate at least some of the increased damage I'd be taking by dropping Grit's considerable (20%) reduction in incoming damage.

DRK's AoE aggro move is also a bit more intuitive than PLD's Flash, whose radius I'm still not entirely 100% sure of. Unleash, meanwhile, displays a very clear area of effect when you use it, making it extremely apparent whether your positioning is right or not. It's not quite as satisfying as WAR's cone-area Overpower, being a weird-looking spell with an annoying sound effect rather than a distinctly HULK SMASH-style swing of your axe, but I've also found so far that DRK appears to be able to hold aggro pretty well even with only a couple of Unleashes at the start of the fight — perhaps a side-effect of its increased damage when compared to something like PLD.

I'm digging DRK so far, then, and although it's another tank class like my main, it feels different enough from PLD already that I feel like it's going to be enjoyable to level. And who knows? I might even end up maining it if and when I get it to 60.

2090: Fighting Games Are Confusing Love Max!!!!!

Was playing a few games with Andie earlier, and on a whim I decided to give Arcana Heart 3 Love Max!!!!! a try, since it had been eyeing me up from the Steam store for a while, and I'd been curious to give a modern fighting game a go.

My history with fighting games is a bit patchy. I played a lot of Street Fighter II back on the Super NES; I had an American copy, so it ran in super-widescreen thanks to NTSC/PAL differences, but it was still pretty fun. I also played a bit of Street Fighter IV on the 360, and various installments in the Dead or Alive series over the years. But I've never really got my head around anything more complex than the original Street Fighter II which, as fighting game enthusiasts will doubtless know, is considerably simpler than the monstrosities we have today.

One of the reasons I decided to give Arcana etc etc a go was because it appears to be regarded as a reasonably accessible example of a genre that has become increasingly impenetrable to newcomers over the years. It still has its fair share of complexity, mind you, and a few systems whose use isn't immediately obvious — not to mention a lack of in-game tutorial — but once you get your head around the basic systems, it's relatively straightforward.

The basic controls are pretty simple. You have a light, medium and heavy attack, and standard Street Fighter-style button combinations (various quarter and half-circles along with the Dragon Punch Z-shape plus an attack button) tend to unleash special moves for most characters. There's also a "homing" button, which is Arcana Heart's main distinguishing feature from other games of its ilk; tapping this causes you to home in on your opponent, and tapping it again causes you to home in more quickly while allowing you a certain degree of control over your trajectory. By using this, you can have some pretty impressive mid-air battles rather than being confined to the ground; it also makes for some interesting dodging mechanics that I haven't quite got the hang of yet.

The Arcana part of the title refers to a significant addition to the usual fighting game formula: as well as selecting a character, you also pick an Arcana to assign to them. Each of these Arcana have their own set of benefits and drawbacks as well as a few extra special moves; essentially, they allow you to tweak and customise the character you're using in various ways according to how you like to play. It also effectively makes the character roster expand considerably, as equipping a new Arcana in many cases makes a character play rather differently.

The bit that usually confuses me about modern fighting games is all the gauges on screen at any time. Arcana Heart, despite doing a piss-poor job of explaining these in the game itself, is relatively easy to understand once you know what they all do. Your health bar is self-explanatory; the little curvy bar next to it is called the "Focus bar" and allows you to trigger a short-lived mode where you move faster and have some other buffs; the bar at the bottom is your "Arcana bar" and is expended on super-special moves of various descriptions. The Arcana bar starts at one-third of its maximum possible value; in order to expand it, you have to land attacks or get hit, but the bar will only grow if it's not in the process of recharging. In other words, you have to restrain yourself a bit with the supers if you want to grow the bar to its maximum potential, which you'll need to do if you want to unleash the most devastating moves in your character and Arcana's respective arsenals.

I absolutely haven't got my head around how to play the game well yet, but I feel I at least understand the basic systems, which is more than I can say for some other modern fighting games out there. I feel like with a bit of practice — as well as curtailing my tendency to panic when playing fighting games and lapse into button-mashing mode — I might be able to get the hang of this, and hopefully have the opportunity to teach it to some friends, too, as I can see it being a lot of fun against other people owing to its inherent ridiculousness.

A decent investment, then; I'll be curious to see how much — or indeed if — I improve with a bit of practice.

2087: Virtual Photography

I've been fascinated by the idea of "virtual photography" for quite some time now. For those wondering what on Earth I'm talking about, I'm referring to the idea of creating aesthetically pleasing screenshots using video games as the base medium, but sometimes involving editing software to touch them up a bit or get rid of some of the inevitable glitches you find in polygon-based games.

A lot of modern games are embracing their photo-realistic nature by including a photo mode right there in the game itself; these modes often include numerous realistic filters and settings that work like an actual camera, as well as, often, an enhanced version of the game engine that sacrifices framerate in the name of visual fidelity, since virtual photography is more concerned with the quality of still images than fluidity of movement.

What I've found more interesting over the years, though, is the ability of games to let us photograph things we simply wouldn't be able to in reality. Fantastic structures, stylised characters, improbable situations, that sort of thing. And as such, although I like the idea of photo modes in stuff like Forza Motorsport and its ilk, I'm inevitably drawn much more towards games that allow you to photograph characters and fantastic environments rather than cars. Nothing against cars, of course; I'm just more interested in people and places.

Second Life

A few years back, I spent quite a lot of time in the social/creative MMO Second Life. I was going through some difficult stuff at the time, and the people I met in there helped me through it a great deal — more than they perhaps knew. To my shame, I haven't been back for quite some time and I don't know how many of them would remember me now — it's been a good five years or so since I logged in, I think — but I have fond memories from that time, and pleasingly, I have a visual record of many of those fond memories.

Early on in my time "on the Grid", as Second Life players called it, I developed a fascination with photographing people's avatars. Since your avatar was a reflection of your personality in Second Life — you could change appearance at will, and there was no "level-locked" equipment or anything; you just had to create, find or purchase items — I found this to be an interesting means of coming to understand various people. Above you can see one Kade Klata, someone who was a great friend to me during the aforementioned difficult times, and someone who got me into this whole virtual photography thing in the first place.

Kade disappeared off the Grid one day and I was never sure where she went; wherever you are, Kade, I hope you're happy, and I hope you know you touched my life for the better.

This was an early experiment with using heavily stylised filters to smooth off the rough edges of Second Life's graphics. This particular image was taken in a region called "Botanical", which was renowned for having beautifully constructed scenery. Worthy of note is the fact that all the buildings, scenery and objects in Second Life are constructed by the "players", so someone had spent a lot of time on this place; it seemed only fitting to immortalise it somehow.

I normally hate taking pictures of myself, but even though I loosely modelled my Second Life avatar on myself, I actually enjoyed putting myself into virtual photographs. This image was in a moody area called "Templum Ex Obscurum"; I forget what its actual purpose was — perhaps just to look pretty — but I was pleased with how this shot came out, and even more pleased with the fancy lighting I managed to create while figuring out how Photoshop worked.

I don't mind admitting that when I was most involved in Second Life, I was somewhat emotionally fragile. One of the things I liked most about that virtual world when I was in it, though, was the fact that there were all manner of ways to express yourself. This image, taking alongside one "Rylan Carling", who graciously agreed to come and model for me, was actually rather cathartic to create. (That's "me" in the background; by this point, I'd been given something of a virtual makeover by a friend.)

…Yeah, I was pretty emo around that time. (Hell, I still am; I still like this image and what it symbolised when I was putting it together.) Anyway, enough of that; if you want to see more images from that time, take a peek at my long-abandoned Flickr account.

Final Fantasy XIV

The inherent drama in a role-playing game makes for some great "photos", assuming you can time pressing that screenshot button correctly. Like this:

Or this:

And then, of course, like Second Life, there's the self-expression element of everyone's avatars thanks to the "Glamour" system, whereby you can make one piece of gear look like another.

This image is pretty special to me; it's our whole Free Company meeting for a "group photo" shortly before the release of the first expansion pack Heavensward.

Custom Maid 3D 2

And finally, it would be remiss of me to talk about virtual photography without mentioning Custom Maid 3D 2, which I introduced to you all the other day. Unfortunately, the vast majority of the "photographs" I've taken using this are, shall we say, not entirely suitable for publication on this particular blog (I have a few standards!) but, well, here's a few that I feel I probably can just about get away with…

The thing that's impressed me most about CM3D2 so far is the fact that it's the closest I've seen 3D graphics get to 2D art. The character models, the art style, the outlining, the cel-shading and the expressiveness of the faces — all of those things combine to create something that is not at all "realistic", of course, but which is a very convincing recreation of the idealised anime style.

As you'd expect from something with the word Custom in its title, the character creation system in CM3D2 is pretty astounding, allowing you to customise pretty much anything from face and body shape to eye style and whether or not the character has one or two of those cute little "fangs" you sometimes see anime girls depicted with. You can even set how heavy their boobs are. And choose their clothes, obviously. Dressing your maids up is one of the most fun parts of the game that doesn't involve doing lewd things.

Even the lewd bits are eminently suitable for virtual photography, though, since there are a number of "actions" that simply pose rather than… you know… do stuff. Combine these poses with the control you have over their costumes as well as the camera control mod that allows seriously precise positioning of your viewpoint plus the wonderful ability to make the characters look at the camera on command (assuming it wouldn't be physically impossible) and you have a virtual photo studio that's a whole lot of fun to play around with.

Games are art, yo.

2086: Souls: Reaped

I finally got around to beating the Diablo III: Reaper of Souls campaign today. I originally wasn't going to bother, as I was primarily interested in playing the new(ish) Adventure Mode rather than grinding through the campaign again, but I found myself enjoying the experience more than I expected, particularly in Act V.

I often think of Blizzard games as being rather weak on the story front. There are exceptions, of course — Warcraft III was particularly strong, for example — but on the whole, I've never really come to Blizzard games for the story. They are masters of their art when it comes to gameplay, but when it comes to storytelling, there are people out there who do it a whole lot better.

Or at least, that's what I'd been thinking. But replaying the Diablo III campaign and having my first run through the Reaper of Souls Act, I was actually quite surprised to see some reasonably decent writing along the way. I mean, the overall plot is still the sort of thing an angsty teenager would come up with if they wanted to write something dramatic (Angels! Demons! Eternal Conflict! Killing death itself!) but the individual moments that you encounter along the way are actually pretty good, even if some of the more supposedly "shocking" moments — the death of Cain, for example — were underwhelming due to their presentation.

I played through the campaign as the female Wizard, who has an endearingly posh voice and a penchant for sarcasm. Consequently, I found myself liking her a whole lot, which is not something you can usually say about the mostly-mute protagonists of loot-whoring dungeon-crawling action RPGs. Her interactions with some of the more tiresome characters — such as the perpetually grumpy head of the angels — were particular highlights for me. "Know this, nephalem," he said. "You may defeat Malthael, but I will not thank you for it." "No," replied my character, sighing. "Of course you won't. And that's part of your charm."

Since I'd already levelled my Wizard a fair bit in Adventure Mode before running through the campaign, I hit the level cap well before the end and started earning Paragon experience. The last time I played Diablo III, this system wasn't in place, so I was interested to see how it worked. Turns out it makes for an enjoyable endgame experience that doesn't rely on long-winded grinding for currency or large amounts of effort for relatively small, incremental amounts of progress. It would be completely inappropriate for a full-on MMO, mind you, given that it has the potential to totally unbalance your character if you put the time into it, but for Diablo, which has always been a series about seeing how big you can make the numbers that pop out of monsters when you smack them in the face, it's perfect.

If you've never capped a character in Diablo III and are curious, the Paragon system works like this: once you hit the current cap (level 70) your experience bar turns blue from its original orange, but you continue to earn experience as you did before. Early Paragon levels cost considerably less experience than the top end of the regular levels (7 million XP to go from regular Level 70 to Paragon Level 1 vs 83 million XP to go from regular Level 69 to 70) but the amount required increases gradually as you gain levels.

Gaining a Paragon level gives you a point to spend in one of four categories in turn. Your first point is in the Core Stats category, which includes your class' primary stat, which affects damage; Vitality, which affects your maximum HP and defence; Movement Speed, which is self-explanatory; and Maximum Resource, which is the thing your character spends to use skills or cast spells. Your next point is in the Offense category, which includes attack speed, critical hit rate, critical hit damage increase and cooldown reduction. Then there's the Defense category, which includes maximum life, armour rating, your natural regeneration rate and bonuses to your resistances. Then your fourth point goes in the Utility category, which includes area damage, the amount of life you get back per successful hit on an enemy, the amount of bonus gold you find and a reduction to the costs of your skills. Once you've spent a point in each of the four categories, your fifth goes into Core Stats, your sixth into Offense and so on.

The interesting thing about the Paragon system is that it's account-wide — in other words, your Paragon level applies to all your characters, even the ones that aren't yet at the level cap. This means that you can make levelling subsequent characters much easier if you have a decent Paragon level, because they'll be operating at a considerably stronger level than they would normally be otherwise. What's also quite nice is the fact that you can redistribute the Paragon points whenever you like (so long as you're not in combat) and each character can have a different setup as you see fit; the "shared" part is just how many points you have available.

Now I've beaten the campaign properly, I can focus on Adventure Mode, and now I'm at level 70 I can investigate some of the really interesting stuff like Greater Rifts and tracking down the Keymaster monsters. Endgame Diablo III certainly sounds like an intriguing time, and certainly a far cry from the completely non-existent endgame that it launched with. I'm glad I'm coming to it now, though; having experienced MMO endgame play in Final Fantasy XIV, I now understand the appeal of an endgame and why Diablo III needed one, whereas when I originally played the game I didn't really get why people seemed to be so annoyed that it was lacking in level-cap content.

Anyway. Time for bed before I get tempted to try and reach Paragon Level 30 this evening…

2085: Be Good to Your Meidos

References to lewd stuff ahead. No actual porn though.

Largely out of curiosity (and in part due to being a filthy pervert) I decided to check out Custom Maid 3D 2 on the recommendation of some friends who also enjoy such things. And I've been pleasantly surprised by what this delightful package of filth offers.

Custom Maid 3D 2, is, like its similarly named predecessor, a sex game. I don't mean that in the way that mainstream press tends to refer to visual novels with explicit content, though it is Japanese, much like the visual novels in question; I mean it's a game where a significant component of the gameplay revolves around sex. I've long been fascinated with various interactive depictions of "virtual sex"; frankly, I find the whole scene to be a rather interesting means of living out all manner of fantasies safely and without hurting anyone, though naturally I hasten to add that nothing compares to actually having a real partner and doing things in the 3D world. I know that during "dry spells" over the years, though, stuff like this has proven to be an adequate substitute, if you know what I mean.

But anyway. I don't want to focus specifically on the pornographic aspects of Custom Maid 3D 2 because although it is hot as hell, the fact it depicts sex is not the most interesting thing about it. No; it's the fact that rather than being a straightforward "interactive porn movie" type of experience, there's actually a surprisingly deep and involved game in there too. Whether or not it is in good taste is another matter, of course, but if you can deal with the sexy stuff, there's an interesting experience to be had.

Custom Maid 3D 2 casts you in the role of the owner of an exclusive club. Your uncle passed it on to you, telling you only the bare minimum of details before buggering off to get married and leaving you with a failing business deep in debt. Essentially, the establishment you find yourself taking ownership of is an "adult entertainment" club where the maids who staff it, among other things, provide "night service" to paying customers. Unfortunately, owing to your uncle apparently being more of a playboy than a businessman, the club isn't in a particularly good state when you get your hands on it; there aren't even any maids left working there aside from your uncle's loyal secretary, who is strictly off-limits for anything other than professional discussions.

What then transpires is that you hire a maid to your own specifications (providing a loose narrative excuse for a shockingly detailed character creator that is almost the most fun part of the package) and then spend ten days "training" her to be a… suitable employee for this type of establishment. This involves a combination of sending her out to classes in the daytime, each of which affect various stats, usually in positive ways, and at night… well, you bang her, obviously.

Here's the interesting part: the sexy bits actually involve a certain degree of strategy and RPG-style resource management, of all things. Before you get it on, you have a certain amount of "stamina" you can spend on setting up a "playlist" of various activities. some of which are conditional on the location and whether or not she's drunk; going over the stamina limit will cause your maid to pass out during the session and perform poorly the following day, so it's in your interests to try and spend this as efficiently as possible.

Once you get started, each "activity" has several different actions you can take. Each one of these has an impact on a number of things according to what the action and overall activity is. Usually, an action will increase some sex-related stats significantly while reducing some of the more "innocent" stats (like "charm" and "leadership abilities") to a lesser degree. At the same time, the action will impact the maid's excitement, mind and reason levels; excitement affects the animations that play (and possibly the effect on stats? I haven't researched thoroughly yet), mind presents a limit on the actions you can perform during a single activity — running out of it means you can't do anything else, though it gets restored when you start a new activity — and reason causes negative impacts on stats to be stronger when it runs out.

On top of all that, the maid gains overall experience for each activity she participates in as well as "mastery" of the various activities. Improving mastery results in stronger, more efficient stat gains when performing that activity, and can also unlock new activities. Yes, we are indeed talking about a game with a skill tree that consists entirely of lewd things. Gaining experience can allow the maid to perform her various duties better — she has a separate level and "class" for sexy and non-sexy duties — and her disposition can change according to the activities she masters and does most frequently. In other words, you can "build" each maid as you see fit, and the game provides a number of special events and achievements as incentive for you to experiment with the maids you hire and discover the different types of character you can create.

It's an oddly fascinating little game, really; while there are doubtless people out there who will likely take umbrage at the very concept (particularly the "training" aspect), those of you with a penchant for the lewder side of life may want to give it a look. Just don't complain to me if you find yourself as engrossed by the gameplay as you are by the rude bits!

2082: Naked Fairies Blow Shit Up

I seem to be having a bit of a shoot 'em up kick at the minute, which is no bad thing, since I have quite a good selection of them now. Most recently, aside from Eschatos, which I talked a bit about recently, I've been very much enjoying Raiden IV: Overkill on PC.

I like the Raiden series a lot. Raiden Project — an enhanced port of Raiden I and II — was one of the first games I played on the original PlayStation, and I've followed the series on and off ever since. Raiden IV, I'm pleased to note, remains very much true to the series' roots while being rather more up-to-date in terms of presentation — the recently released PC version happily runs in full 1080p resolution, which looks glorious.

One of the reasons I like Raiden — and Eschatos, for that matter — is that it's not a bullet hell shooter. I enjoy bullet hell shooters, don't get me wrong, but sometimes it's nice to enjoy something that isn't quite so buttock-clenchingly tense at all times. This isn't to say Raiden is without its moments of tension, mind; there's plenty of buttock-clenching throughout the course of a playthrough, but these instances tend to be spread out a bit more than in something like DoDonPachi Resurrection.

Another reason I like Raiden is its weapon system — and this is another contrast from many bullet hell titles. Rather than having a weapon that is enormously overpowered from the very beginning of the game, Raiden has always had three different weapons to choose between, plus three different subweapons to go alongside them. The standard Vulcan cannon has good power and, when upgraded, can happily fill the screen with a wide volley of bullets. The blue laser, meanwhile, is rather narrow, even at its highest power level, but is also the most damaging of all the weapons. And then there's the infamous "toothpaste laser" in the purple containers, which remains one of the most inadvertently (or perhaps deliberately?) hilarious weapons in a shoot 'em up ever, tying itself in knots as more and more enemies come onto the screen.

Interestingly, in Raiden IV you actually have several different ships to choose from. There's the default Raiden IV ship, which is like the ship from the previous games, only the basic, low-level Vulcan cannon you start with has a bit of a spread shot already applied to it. Then there's the ship from the previous games, whose basic Vulcan cannon fires straight ahead and only spreads when upgraded. And then there's a naked fairy — fairies have traditionally been the hidden, secret score items in Raiden games — that is much more agile than the standard fighters, and has her own complement of weapons that behave rather differently to the default ones.

Raiden IV Overkill is a comprehensive package with a number of different ways to play, each of which force you to approach it a little differently. The standard Arcade mode is where I've been spending most of my time, but the titular Overkill mode is fun, too; here, when you destroy a non-popcorn enemy you can continue shooting it to increase an Overkill meter, with bigger bonuses awarded for more post-mortem damage inflicted before it finally explodes. This forces you to play a bit more aggressively in order to score Overkills and collect the resulting medals, and it's an interesting twist on the original formula.

I am absolutely rubbish at Raiden IV so far, but as I've managed to improve my skills somewhat at Eschatos with a little practice, I don't doubt I'll eventually be able to get all the way through Raiden IV on a single credit, even if it's only on the easiest difficulty.

Still, as monstrously difficult as it is, it's a whole lot of fun, at least. I highly recommend grabbing a copy if you enjoy a good old-fashioned shoot 'em up.