#oneaday Day 120: Don't let completionism ruin your fun

There's been a marked shift in people's attitudes towards finishing games over the course of the last 20 years or so. Well, several, I think, brought about by a number of "innovations" (for want of a better word) that, in several instances, I'm not entirely sure are a positive thing.

There's one group of people who never finish anything they start playing. I've talked about That One Guy In That Discord I'm In before, and the way he does things — installing (and, presumably, uninstalling) multiple huge games per day, playing them for seemingly about twenty minutes before starting something else — drives me absolutely nuts. It evidently works for him, though, and it's not my place to tell him how to enjoy himself.

Also falling into a similar category are the Oh, That Game's On Game Pass crowd, who will maybe try something for twenty minutes because it's "free" (no it's not, you're renting it with that subscription fee you're paying) and then never beat it. These people also drive me nuts, and I am less forgiving of them, since I firmly believe Game Pass is a net negative for the games industry.

Then, at the absolute other end of the spectrum are the people who don't believe they've "finished" a game until they've "Platinumed" or "100%ed" it. These are the people I'm specifically pondering today.

Among these people are those who will specifically seek out games that are "easy Platinums" to bolster their stats, which no-one actually gives a shit about. I have dabbled in that direction before, particularly around the Vita era, when I liked to take aim for a game's Platinum trophy as a means of showing my appreciation to the people who made it. Developers do use achievements and trophies as metrics, after all, so seeing that someone had taken the time to do everything in their game would presumably count for something.

But playing like that is two things. One: it's incredibly time consuming. Two: it's quite tedious. Because while there are some interesting and creative uses of achievements and trophies out there, the vast majority of them involve either simply making progress in a game, or completing some sort of task that takes a long while and, more often than not, involves a significant amount of repetition.

So I've stopped. I no longer aim to Platinum games I play on PlayStation, and I don't give much of a toss about achievements on other platforms. Moreover, I actively prefer playing on platforms that don't have achievement functionality at all, like the Switch and anything pre-Xbox 360/PS3.

Right now, as you'll know if you've been paying attention, I am playing through the .hack series on PlayStation 2. This set of four games clock in at about 15 hours each, but you can spend quite a bit more time on each entry grinding out various things. Optional things; things that you don't need to do in order to beat the game or even to have a satisfying experience with it.

I pondered taking the time to try and "100%" the first entry, .hack//INFECTION, before I moved on to the second episode, .hack//MUTATION. I'd beaten the main story and had the opportunity to go back into the game world to clean up some optional tasks before transferring my data to the next game. I started looking into the possibility of what I might need to do to achieve that, and the answer was, effectively "grind".

"Fuck that," I thought, saving my game and reaching for the next game's case. Now I've moved on, and I'm perfectly happy about that. I've been enjoying the game nicely in my way, and I've been trying to avoid looking up too much information, because I, like a lot of us, I suspect, have got into the habit of looking at walkthroughs and other information about games as I play to "make sure I don't miss anything".

Well, I got thinking. When I was playing games back in the PS2 era, I didn't really care if I "missed anything". Sure, it was nice to know if there were some secrets and cool things I could find, but I didn't go out of my way to do anything that sounded like it might be boring, annoying or overly time-consuming. And my gaming experience certainly didn't suffer for that attitude. So I'm trying to get my head back in that space now, in 2024, while I play through these 20 year old action RPGs. It doesn't matter that I can't get first place in the Grunty race on Theta server, because it's an optional side activity that not everyone is expected to complete. It doesn't matter that I haven't traded with every single NPC possible to get the books that give me an extra stat point in all my stats, because while a single stat point does make a difference in .hack, there's also lots of shiny equipment that boosts your stats, too.

Checklists, achievements, wikis and all manner of other things have the potential to really suck the fun out of games at times. These things are supposed to be fun and enjoyable, not work. So I'm making a specific effort to try not to care about "whether I missed anything", and just do the things that I happen to stumble across as I play until I've completed them to my satisfaction.

I'll add to all this that I am a firm believer in completing games, particularly when we're talking narrative-centric games like RPGs. I cannot abide leaving a story half-finished, regardless of medium, so I still make an effort to finish the games I start. It's the stuff that isn't directly related to that central story aspect that I'm doing my best to let go of. Not as a general rule or anything, but more from a perspective of not deliberately going out of my way to make a game un-fun.

Because these days, the temptation to make a game un-fun is everywhere. Look at a walkthrough and you'd think there was only one possible way to beat every game, because some guy on the Internet says so. No. There are many ways to beat many games, and the best thing to do is to find what works for you. If that means 100%ing it, more power to you; you are the reason all those optional side activities exist. But if you find yourself getting annoyed or frustrated with those same optional side activities, no-one — not even the developers — is going to judge you for saying "fuck this, I just want to see how the story ends".

That said, I've spent two hours searching for Grunty food in .hack//MUTATION this evening. But it was my choice to do so. Besides, I had fun levelling Kite, BlackRose and Mistral in the process anyway, so it's not as if it was wasted effort or anything.

Anyway, yeah. If you've ever found yourself contemplating something you were playing and thinking "gosh, I wish there was less to do in this game", you are the one in the position of power. You are the one holding the controller. Unless the game is specifically requiring you to do each and every little thing it offers, you are the one with the power to say "fuck this" and just get on with what you deem to be "the fun bit".

So exercise that power!

Want to read my thoughts on various video games, visual novels and other popular culture things? Stop by MoeGamer.net, my site for all things fun where I am generally a lot more cheerful. And if you fancy watching some vids on classic games, drop by my YouTube channel.

If you want this nonsense in your inbox every day, please feel free to subscribe via email. Your email address won't be used for anything else.

#oneaday Day 119: One quarter dotHacked

Ten to one in the morning again, oh no. But hah, it's Friday night so it doesn't count. Well, okay, it does, because this probably now means I'm going to sleep until lunchtime tomorrow, but who cares. The weekend is for enjoying, and a valid means of enjoying it is sleeping late.

The reason I am once again coming to you from the Dark Hour is that I finished .hack//INFECTION this evening. I've beaten this before, but never actually played the other three, despite owning them all back in the day, then reacquiring them all at moderate expense a few years back. (Reacquiring them now would be great expense, so I'm glad I nabbed them when I did… although I discovered my copy of .hack//QUARANTINE has the wrong manual, and people online want somewhere in the region of fifty fucking dollars just for the manual, so fuck that, it can just be wrong.

As discussed the other day, .hack//INFECTION is an interesting beast in that it's the first part of a tetralogy (apparently that is the correct term, not "quadrilogy", I learned something today) of PS2 games that tell one coherent story in four parts. The cynical would suggest that this was done so that they could make four times the money out of one normal length RPG, as each individual part is around 15 hours long, and they're probably right. But it's still interesting. To me, anyway.

In each part, you play the role of Kite, a player in the online RPG The World, and much of what you do in each of the four volumes is… simply play The World, which is a Phantasy Star Online-style affair in which you head off into dungeons with or without some companions in tow, hack and slash your way through a bunch of enemies and gather lots of phat loot along the way.

Its unique twist is that its various areas are generated through various combinations of keywords that control everything from the level of the enemies in the area to the weather and geographical features you might stumble across. This is an aspect of the game they don't explain very well and no-one over the course of the last 22 years appears to have successfully figured out, so you'll just have to take their word for it. What it essentially boils down to is that you can jam three unrelated words or phrases together and it will send you to a new area with an amusing name like "Bottomless Someone's Giant" or "Raging Pagan Fuckwhistle".

There is a certain amount of method to the madness, because in combining different keywords together, you can cause different elements to have dominance in the field, which means you're more likely to find items related to that element. And elemental weaknesses are worth exploiting in The World… plus the items that temporarily boost your affinity for a particular element are a popular trade item with the in-game NPCs, so they're worth collecting to get your hands on the often rare stuff they might give up in exchange.

.hack//INFECTION (and its three follow-ups) are not RPGs I would necessarily recommend to everyone. They're a far cry from the big budget cinematic spectacles many had come to expect from the genre post Final Fantasy VII, and thus they suffered a bit in reviews back in the day. However, if you're on board with what they have to offer, which is a convincing simulation of playing a 2002-era online action RPG with lots of dungeon crawling and loot collecting, there's a lot of fun to be had. The basic mechanics are simple and straightforward, but there's a pleasant purity to just ploughing your way through a dungeon and watching everyone's levels and related statistics go up.

My main draw is that I've always been a sucker for the "something sinister is going on in a computer game" trope ever since I read the short story Vurfing the Gwrx from a book called Peter Davison's Book of Alien Monsters as a child. (The Peter Davison in question who endorsed that book was, in fact, Doctor Who, but my family and I just found it entertaining that "I" had a book.) I don't remember much about the story — I should probably revisit it with grown-up eyes — but I do remember finding it both entertaining and pleasingly chilling as a kid. And I like .hack because I get a similar sort of vibe from it.

.hack doesn't go quite into the "if you die in the game you die for real" territory that Sword Art Online ran with some years later, but the idea of a video game (and the virus contained therein) causing people to fall into real-life comas is a concept I found intriguing and creepy, in a good way. To this day, I still don't know where the story goes after the conclusion of .hack//INFECTION, which really just acts as an introduction and setup more than anything, so I'm intrigued to finally dive into the follow-ups and see where things go from there.

For now, though, I think I've earned that lie-in.

If you want this nonsense in your inbox every day, please feel free to subscribe via email. Your email address won't be used for anything else.

#oneaday Day 118: I left this too late again

Oh dear. Half past midnight and I haven't written anything. Time to quickly think of something off the top of my head!

Err… quick! Video games! I bought Victory Heat Rally today. This is a game I've had my eye on for a while (though not as long as some other people have, from the sound of things) after I played its excellent demo a few Steam Next Fests ago. I'm going to do a full writeup and video on this at some point in the very near future, but suffice to say for now that it's very good.

It's a game that takes aim at Sega's "Super Scaler" racers in style, with Power Drift being a particular inspiration. It doesn't slavishly try to ape the retro style, mind — though there is a nice "pixelise" filter option for the visuals — and rather makes use of some nice pixel art for the characters, cars and some roadside objects, and low-poly environments. It moves along at a fair old clip even on my mini PC that doesn't have a graphics card, and it's a lot of fun to play.

Besides Power Drift, it also draws inspiration from Ridge Racer (drift-heavy handling, '90s rave soundtrack), Sega Rally (rally stages with exaggerated handling), Mario Kart (multiple tracks set in a limited number of environments) and probably some others that I can't think of right now because I'm tired. It takes all these elements and blends them together to make an immensely compelling game that I've played for about 5 hours this evening.

The first series of championship challenges is a bit easy, but the second ramps things up nicely to a good challenge level. There are also some truly infuriating bonus stages known as "Joker" levels where you have to race through checkpoints against the clock while performing some sort of precise driving task. The one I'm presently stuck on requires you to take full advantage of the "drift boost" mechanic the game has borrowed from Mario Kart and boost through various checkpoints. This is a lot harder than it sounds, particularly with the awkward placement of some of these checkpoints, and it has cause many expletives to belch forth from my mouth this evening.

While these levels are infuriatingly difficult, the rest of the game seems pitched at a pretty sensible difficulty level. The opening championship eases you into things nicely, then things ramp up from there. I suspect the third series of championships will be genuinely quite difficult, if the escalation in the second series is anything to go by.

But anyway. Half past midnight, like I said, so I should probably close everything down and go to sleep. There can (and probably will) be more racing tomorrow.

If you want this nonsense in your inbox every day, please feel free to subscribe via email. Your email address won't be used for anything else.

#oneaday Day 117: Car Racing

This evening, I felt like playing some random PlayStation 2 shenanigans, so I fired up R: Racing for the first time. (My wife misheard the name as "Car Racing" and was somewhat incredulous; I almost didn't want to correct her.)

For the unfamiliar, R: Racing is a game from Namco where they sort of wanted to make a new Ridge Racer, but also wanted to get in on this "racing sim" action that had been growing in popularity since the original Gran Turismo at the tail end of the previous generation. To that end, they made what is essentially a new Ridge Racer game, but featuring real cars and circuits along with the requisite tuning options that no-one understands.

One of the things that excited me most about R: Racing back when it was originally announced was that it had an actual story mode. This was very unusual for racing games at the time, and when it first released I still hadn't come to the conclusion that no, not all games need stories, a subject that I was sure I'd blogged about at some point in the past, but couldn't find any evidence thereof.

Anyway, long story short, for one reason or another I never picked up R: Racing back in the day, despite it being something that appealed quite a bit… but it is one of the many titles I added to my PS2 collection when I stumbled across it in CEX for somewhere in the region of 50p and subsequently never got around to actually trying. Until now!

Honestly, of all the things it reminds me of, it's actually most akin to the Ace Combat series. Perhaps not surprising, since they're both Namco titles — and there's a strong argument to suggest the Ridge Racer series unfolds in Ace Combat's Strangereal setting — but it works pretty well. The narrative sequences are kept short and snappy — arguably to a fault — but it provides a certain incentive to progress through the game's 14-chapter "Racing Life" mode, which appears to be primarily intended as an introduction before what I assume is "the real game" starts. Put it this way: I'm 6 chapters into that 14-chapter story after a little over an hour of play, and my save file says it's 12% complete. That suggests you beat the story and there's a whole lot more stuff to fiddle around with.

The narrative involves Rena, a female protagonist — quick, alert the Woke Content Detector idiots! — who works as an ambulance driver. One day, she displays some fancy moves on the job, and her coworker, who apparently never sleeps, signs her up to be part of a mysterious organisation known as "G.V.I." who are somehow involved with motorsports, but in what appears to be a not entirely trustworthy sort of way. Rather than being a racing team themselves, it appears that they work with racing teams and… honestly, I don't really understand at the point I'm at in the narrative because it hasn't really explained anything other than the fact it somehow caused Rena's amply-bosomed rival Gina to be pissy with her pretty much immediately upon first meeting her.

What then follows is a series of races and championships, beginning with a straightforward speedway race that is easy to win, and progressing through track, street and rally racing across several courses, many of which appear to have several variations in the same way that the Ridge Racer series' tracks typically unfold as different routes through the same environments.

R: Racing's unique selling point appears to be its "pressure" mechanic, whereby if you get up another driver's arse for long enough, a bar above their car starts filling up, and when it fills, they'll get so stressed out at your proximity to their rectum that they'll do something stupid, allowing you to pass easily. There's no obligation to fill the bar, and indeed doing so for every opponent is probably quite inefficient, but it's fun nonetheless — and it's a mechanic I've not really seen in a racer before. Presumably it's attempting to reflect the sort of stress the player feels when they have an opponent bearing down on them in their rear-view mirror; in execution, it's a tad "artificial", but, well, it's a mechanic that is there to be taken advantage of, so you might as well do so!

The soundtrack hails from post-Ridge Racer V Namco so unfortunately we've left the funky acid jazz beats of the late PS1 era far behind and are into cacophonous EDM territory. R: Racing's soundtrack isn't quite as obnoxiously awful as Ridge Racer V's, but it's almost aggressively bland, which is a bit of a shame. The Ridge Racer series has some serious highs when it gets music right, so it's always unfortunate when an entry doesn't really live up to those standards.

Still, it's an enjoyable enough game. Although definitely more sim-esque than the mainline Ridge Racer titles, it's also a lot more forgiving than the Gran Turismos and Forza Motorsports (do they still make those?) of the world. There's a braking assist function for those allergic to actually using the brakes themselves, which makes the game feel really arcadey (and a tad easy), but you can still throw the cars into power slides if you're aggressive enough with them. It's just not necessarily the best thing to do at every opportunity in R: Racing, unlike mainline Ridge Racer.

I enjoyed what I played this evening! I'm looking forward to exploring it a bit further. It occupies a nice sweet spot between sim and arcade that I rather like, and the story mode is intriguing, even if, as I suspect, it turns out to be a bit rushed and doesn't really go anywhere. Even if that does end up being the case, I suspect the "Event Challenge" mode, or whatever it's called, will have a fair bit of meat on the bones to fiddle around with. We'll see, I guess, and I'll write something more substantial once I've spent some more time with it.

For now, though, an evening well spent, I say.

If you want this nonsense in your inbox every day, please feel free to subscribe via email. Your email address won't be used for anything else.

#oneaday Day 116: Should you finish a game before talking about it?

I've seen some discussion about the above topic recently, largely as a result of some idiotic blowhard on the dying, burning remains of Twitter making the bizarre assertion that all games journalists should be obliged to upload full, unedited footage of them playing every game they cover to "prove" that they played it properly and to demonstrate their "authentic" reactions.

This is, of course, absolutely unworkable today, particularly for those working in the more "mainstream" end of gaming, where sprawling games that want to be your one and only game forever (or at least until their next annualised installment comes out) have been creeping towards being the norm for a while now. But it's also unworkable for those working in niche spaces, be that esports, visual novels, role-playing games or any other sectors you might care to mention. There simply isn't time.

Now, I have mixed feelings about this, because back when my brother was in charge of Electronic Gaming Monthly and The Official U.S. PlayStation Magazine at Ziff-Davis, I vaguely recall him saying that he expected his writers to finish everything they wrote about — and this was, in the case of EGM, a publication where each reviewer had to write approximately 50-100 words at most, given the way their reviews were handled.

The reason I recall this is that one time when my parents and I were visiting him in the States, I was able to spend the day with him in his office (and I have oddly vivid memories of someone's computer in the office having something saying "Lucky sonuvabitch" every time they got an email) and he tasked me with playing through Legacy of Kain: Soul Reaver (now available on Evercade, don'tchaknow!). I forget exactly why, but I suspect it was so he could make effective use of my time while I was there, get my thoughts on it, and then use my experiences playing the game to give him a head start on writing something. Possibly. Maybe. Anyway, regardless of the circumstances, I have a memory in my head that I'm fairly convinced is real that says "my brother once expected all of his staff to beat every game before they reviewed it".

In the PS1 era, this was probably practical. RPGs were a thing, sure, but they came out relatively infrequently in English (even more infrequently if you were unfortunate enough to be European) and often long after their Japanese releases, so there was plenty of advance notice to get these done. And other games were significantly shorter, tending to be somewhere between 2 and 10 hours on average, with the odd exception in both directions. (Ridge Racer? 20 minutes. Dragon Quest VII? Yes, I know it's an RPG, but 150+ hours.)

We also had a lot more in the way of "arcade style" games that were split into short levels or missions, or games that were highly replayable — Ridge Racer may be 20 minutes, but it's 20 minutes you'll be happy to spend again and again. Thus it seems perfectly reasonable to expect a games journo to play through everything they might be writing about.

These days? Absolutely definitely not, although there is still something to be said for allowing a writer to provide a full, in-depth discussion of a game after completing all of it. After all, it's kind of absurd to suggest that it's possible to "review" a visual novel without reading all of it, as the whole point of the damn thing is the story. Sure, you can probably give a wiffly-waffly "buyer's guide"-type review saying what you think of the graphics, sound and interface, but if you want to actually discuss and critique it, you need to have played all of it.

I think the distinction between "review as buyer's guide" (which is basically what a lot of people online want) and "review as quasi-academic critique" (which is what a lot of writers want, but rarely get the time to indulge in) is an important one here. The former can be done after just an hour or two of play at most. The latter requires more in-depth research. The former can be shat out for an embargo date. The latter is something best served for well after launch.

Unfortunately, the modern Internet doesn't tend to really reward the latter approach at all until well after the fact — and then only if a game ends up commonly agreed to be some sort of "hidden gem" or "best game that no-one played" or whatever. It increasingly leads me to the conclusion that the very best approach to games writing if all you're concerned about is the quality of the writing is to say "fuck it" to anything that is brand new, and instead focus on games that came out ages ago. Perhaps even generations ago. In-depth explorations of those games are the pieces people are still going to be reading for years to come — and it's what I've always striven for with the stuff I've done on MoeGamer, because it's what I like to read.

I don't give a shit if the latest Assassin's Creed is the same or a bit different from the last one. I do care if some obscure PS2 RPG from 20 years ago is actually the best thing ever and still kind of cheap because no-one bought it or knows its name.

Ah, who am I kidding. RPGs are never cheap.

Anyway, I guess my answer to the question in the title is "no, if you're reviewing something current in a buyer's guide style", but "yes, if you're aiming for quasi-academic critique or analysis". And even then, there's wiggle room. Even recently, I wrote about a couple of the games in UFO 50 before I'd technically "beaten" them, because I'd gained enough knowledge of how they worked to be able to comment on them authoritatively. (I then promptly beat them shortly after writing about them, much to my satisfaction!)

So no. Games journos should not be expected to upload full, unedited gameplay footage of them playing through (and reacting to) a game for review. That's absolutely absurd. But I do feel like we should strive for better in our games criticism and analysis. Those "buyer's guide" reviews do not stand the test of time very well, whereas articles that take the time to really get to know a game and find out what makes it tick are what insufferable SEO types like to call "evergreen content". And, as much as I hate to agree with anyone who enjoys SEO, it's those articles that people are going to come back to years after a game's release to find out all about it.

If you want this nonsense in your inbox every day, please feel free to subscribe via email. Your email address won't be used for anything else.

#oneaday Day 114: dotHack and Slash

I've been playing .hack//Infection for the last couple of days on PlayStation 2. I've had the full set of four games on my shelf for a very long time and been meaning to properly run through them all, but have somehow never gotten around to it. I have previously completed Infection a very long time ago, but I've never gone through all four games and seen how it all ends — nor have I been spoiled on any of it. I also own a copy of the .hack//G.U. remasters on PlayStation 4, so I'll have to get to those at some point, too, but I wanted to knock out the PS2 games first.

For the unfamiliar, .hack was one of the first (possibly the first) "MMO gone mad, if you die in the game you die for real" series. Unusually, it was designed from the outset as a fully transmedia production: not only were there four PS2 games in the series, each of these games also came with a DVD featuring an episode of a specially made anime known as .hack//Liminality which tells a "real world" story that unfolds concurrently with the events of the game, and there was a completely separate anime series known as .hack//Sign. Since that time, there have apparently been several other anime and manga series, along with the aforementioned .hack//G.U. trilogy of games, which originated on PS2 but which were ported to PS4 in 2017.

That may all sound terribly complicated, but be at ease: you can have a satisfying .hack experience if you just play the games. .hack//Infection, the first of the original set of four games, tells the story of "you", an 8th grader who has just signed up for the hottest new MMO, The World, at the recommendation of your friend Yasuhiko, a veteran player. You join up and in that inimitable "early 2000s MMO" sort of way, you party up with Yasuhiko, or "Orca" as he's known in the game, who destroys absolutely everything before you can even get a hit in by virtue of him being 50 levels higher than you.

But something goes horribly wrong. After an encounter with a mysterious young girl who is seemingly being chased by a bizarre creature carrying a red wand, Orca is entrusted with a strange book and shortly afterwards, his character is "Data Drained", leaving the real Yasuhiko comatose. You end up taking possession of the book, which manifests itself as a strange bracelet that equips you with the power to Data Drain enemies in the game, and it's then up to you to investigate the strange happenings in The World and determine if there's any truth to the game seemingly having an impact on the real world.

The cool thing about .hack//Infection is that the entire PS2 game is diegetic, intended to represent you using your computer to check your mail, read the news and log in to The World. You never see the actual real world yourself in the game — hence the inclusion of the Liminality DVDs — but instead all your investigation is online. This unfolds through a combination of you checking and replying to mails (with predefined responses) and browsing through the official message boards for The World, looking for clues.

Canonically, .hack//Infection is supposed to be unfolding in 2010, but obviously in 2002 developers CyberConnect2 had to make something of a best guess as to what that near-future setting might look like. They actually got a fair few things right, such as high-speed, always-on Internet access being pretty much universal and fibre-optic cables being the main means of this infrastructure being implemented — though here in the real world, fibre broadband is a little more recent than 2010.

What's quite interesting is the design of The World itself, because it could quite plausibly work as an online RPG — though perhaps not in the way that western players understood "MMOs" at the time. For context, World of Warcraft came out in 2004, two years after .hack//Infection, so "MMO" up until that point in the west meant either EverQuest or Ultima Online.

The World is closer in execution to something like Sega's Phantasy Star Online from 2000 in that there are small, shared communal areas (known as "Root Towns") where you can hang out with other players, but your actual fighting and questing takes place in discrete areas that you teleport to rather than exploring a coherent world. It's not quite the same as the "instanced" areas seen in World of Warcraft and, later, Final Fantasy XIV, as you can meet up with other players who happen to be visiting the same area, but the nature of how The World is structured means that you're relatively unlikely to stumble across someone at random.

Anyway, let's not get bogged down too much in details as I'll probably want to write about this on MoeGamer once I'm finished. Suffice to say for now that .hack//Infection and its subsequent parts unfold as a combination of you just flat-out playing The World to get treasure, gear and helpful items, and gradually working your way through the core mystery at the heart of everything. At most points in the game, you can put the main plot on hold and just go dungeon-crawling to your heart's content — and it's probably advisable to, since you'll need to level both your own character and the various companions you can recruit to your cause.

.hack//Infection is somewhat clunky by more recent action RPG standards, but once you get a feel for it and an understanding of its mechanics, it's enjoyable. There's a variety of enemies to deal with, and their different strengths and weaknesses will often require you to think about various strategies to deal with them. And, since the game is supposed to be simulating an MMO, you can pretty much concentrate on your own play; any companions you bring with you will usually do a pretty good job of fighting alongside you, though you can issue various orders to them if you need them to, say, heal or unleash their most powerful abilities. You can also micromanage their equipment to a certain degree, and since equipment has skills attached, by doing this you can try and optimise them for the challenges you're about to face.

I can completely understand the criticisms of .hack from back in the day. It is repetitive. The dungeons are very obviously constructed from pre-built blocks with different textures put atop them, and there's not a lot of variation to them. And yet there's something about .hack that I've always found fascinating and compelling. I think it's the oddly menacing atmosphere the whole thing has; The World, as a game, is designed to be cheerful and colourful, but it's very obvious that there are dark things going on beneath the surface, and that the players of the game are clearly being used for some nefarious purpose.

I'm in no rush to plough through all four games, but I've enjoyed making a start on .hack//Infection this weekend, and as a long term project I'm looking forward to seeing how it all comes together in the end. And there will, of course, be in-depth articles on MoeGamer (and possibly videos) to go along with it.

If you want this nonsense in your inbox every day, please feel free to subscribe via email. Your email address won't be used for anything else.

#oneaday Day 113: Missing the point of UFO 50

Since UFO 50's release, I've had a few Thoughts. Firstly, UFO 50 is one of the most noteworthy interactive creative projects ever put together. Secondly, there are a lot of (obviously) young people who really Do Not Get It and, in that inimitably entitled way 21st century gamers do, they think it should change entirely to accommodate how they think it "should" be.

Aside: I'm covering UFO 50 both on MoeGamer and on YouTube. Check out here for the written articles, and here for the video versions of the articles. You can also enjoy the whole playlist embedded below.

A significant portion of the "unrest", if you want to call it that, comes from Barbuta being the first game in the collection. Barbuta is, as you'll know if you've read or watched my piece on it, a game that is ostensibly from 1982, and which follows the mould of the "arcade adventure", a genre of game that doesn't really exist any more, but which was a major part of the '80s home computer scene.

In the "lore" of UFO 50, which, if you're unfamiliar, concerns a completely fictional games console known as the LX System, Barbuta was the first game to be developed — and by an individual who had never made a game before, no less. Consequently, it's janky, slow and unrefined — deliberately so. The nature of how it is janky, slow and unrefined makes it very clear that Derek Yu and the various other developers who put UFO 50 together are intimately familiar with '80s home computer games — but it also sets expectations for the rest of UFO 50 accordingly.

One of the most significant things about UFO 50 is that it is, in part, a demonstration of how game design can be inherently intuitive. None of the games feature full instructions beyond their basic controls and sometimes a little bit of in-game information text, and yet they're all designed in such a way that you can figure things out without too much difficulty. In Barbuta's case, the main challenge comes from determining what all the items you can collect actually do — because the game certainly doesn't tell you.

But here's the key thing: it all makes sense. It's easy to determine what all the items do, either by logical deduction or simply observing what happens on-screen. And this is true not just for Barbuta, but also for pretty much all of the other games in the collection, too. You just have to use your brain a bit.

This isn't enough for some "gamers" though. There's a guy on UFO 50's Steam forums spamming pretty much every thread he can find about how he believes the games are a "joke", that it's "not funny" and that the package as a whole is a "scam". There are others complaining about Barbuta as if it's the only game in the collection, refusing to even contemplate trying any of the other 49 that are available. And there are those who simply do not get it.

UFO 50 is a work of art with something to say. It's an acknowledgement both of how rapidly game design evolved over the course of the 1980s, and how modern ideas can be applied to these classic formulae to give them a fresh new twist. Demanding that it change to better fit the needs of attention-deficit zoomers is entirely missing the point. These are games that are supposed to be tricky and perhaps not immediately clear, because that's what games from the '80s were actually like — but dig into things just a little deeper and you'll discover that every single game is inherently fair in a way that only 40 years of evolving game design can manage.

What you have to remember is that when real '80s games came out, they had nothing to refer to on how to do it "right" — and some of them got things what we could consider "wrong" by modern standards. What UFO 50 does is take the conventions of these '80s games, eliminate the things that just flat-out don't work, and gives you a collection of titles that feel authentically retro, but also completely fair and modern in their execution. There's no moon logic, no inconsistent behaviour, no technical shortcomings making things harder through no fault of the player.

In short, it's a work of genius. Perhaps I shouldn't be so surprised that some people don't get it. Perhaps I shouldn't be frustrated that there are people who want to deface it with mods. Perhaps I should just enjoy it myself, and screw the people who don't understand.

Yes. That sounds like a good approach. I'll keep doing that. Please enjoy my series of articles and videos on each and every game!

If you want this nonsense in your inbox every day, please feel free to subscribe via email. Your email address won't be used for anything else.

#oneaday Day 108: Punch punch punch

Because I'm sick of feeling like a decrepit old man and I can't quite muster up the mental wellbeing to head to the gym right now, I dusted off my copy of Fitness Boxing 2 for Nintendo Switch and have been giving it a go for the last couple of days. I considered grabbing the new Hatsune Miku version of the game, but it's £50 and I haven't yet established a good routine with the two previous entries in the series I have on my shelf. So I thought I'd do something about it.

The trouble with exercise is that it always feels like it's going to be a bloody nightmare to get started, particularly after a long period of inactivity, but then once you actually do it it's rather satisfying. My two sessions of Fitness Boxing 2 over the past couple of days have been hard work for someone as out of shape as I am — though my rhythm game skills have netted me a "Fitness Age" of 24 on both occasions, thereby proving once and for all that such a metric is, as everyone suspected, complete bollocks — but I've come out of both of them feeling like I've done something worthwhile, and something that, in the long run, will be good for me.

For those unfamiliar with Fitness Boxing, it's a game that somewhat follows the mould of Nintendo's classic Wii-era fitness games, only with a bit more of a specific focus rather than providing lots of minigames. At its core, it's a rhythm game, tasking you with using the Joy-Cons to punch in various ways and, in the more advanced workouts, ducking, weaving and suchlike, too — though pleasingly, given how dodgy the motion detection can be on movements other than punching, you can turn any troublesome exercises off, or set the game to automatically score you "Perfect" on them, regardless of what the Joy-Cons tell the Switch you were doing.

A full daily workout consists of several stages, beginning and ending with some simple stretches. In between, you'll have a series of specific workouts of varying degrees of intensity and difficulty, typically following your opening stretches and preceding your closing stretches with something relatively gentle and putting one or more fairly high-intensity (and longer) ones in the middle.

Each individual stage tends to unfold in the same way. You'll start in "orthodox" stance (left foot forward, right foot back) and gradually be introduced to a complete combo, usually one move at a time but sometimes a bit quicker in the shorter, lower-intensity stages. You'll gradually build up to performing the full combo, and in a special "Zone" sequence where you get more points, you perform the full combo multiple times in rapid succession — typically four, six or eight times in a row without a gap in between, depending on the length of the combo.

After that, you switch to "southpaw" stance (right foot forward, left foot back) and then do the exact same thing, but the other way around. In the higher intensity, longer workouts, you'll then do another combo, again both in orthodox and southpaw stances, and then you're done.

Typically a short stage lasts about 5-6 minutes, and longer stages are about 11-12 minutes apiece. The "Normal" intensity workout for a day consists of stretches, two short stages and two long stages, totalling about 35-40 minutes of activity altogether; you also have the choice of doing a slightly shorter or longer workout, which equates to about 25-30 or 45-50 minutes of activity respectively by varying the number of stages in the complete workout.

As someone who is desperately unfit, the pacing of the exercises seem OK to me at the moment. The longer stages definitely feel like an effort to endure, but that's good — they're not so difficult that I can't make it through them, but I do feel like I'm doing some actual work that will be beneficial.

I could be doing them better, of course; the game suggests that when you're not punching, you bob back and forth in time with the music and I can't quite manage to keep that up constantly along with all the other stuff, but I'm sure I can get there over the long term. The important thing is, after all, getting started.

The trainer voices throughout are rather repetitive, but helpful in giving you cues and encouragement, and the visual demonstration of what you're supposed to be doing ("mirrored" so you can follow along more easily) is very helpful. The game-like feel to the whole thing makes it feel more "fun" than some other forms of exercise, and there's a wide range of musical accompaniments to go along with your workouts — including both instrumental versions of "real" songs and some original stuff composed specifically for the game. The original stuff is actually quite a bit better than some of the Kidz Bop-tier arrangements, but honestly part of the fun of the game is the absurdity inherent in aggressively throwing punches to something like Hot and Cold by Katy Perry or the frigging YMCA.

I have a long drive tomorrow afternoon after work, and then a long drive back home after work the day after, so I'll likely take a rest for at least tomorrow and possibly the day after also, depending on how I feel when I get back, but I intend to get back to this as soon as I can. It feels pitched at about the level I can deal with right now, and I think it'll just be helpful to get moving a bit in any way. Because I'm sick of waking up aching all over like someone twice my age, and I suspect a significant part of the reason that is happening is because I haven't been exercising.

If you want this nonsense in your inbox every day, please feel free to subscribe via email. Your email address won't be used for anything else.

#oneaday Day 105: Time to sleep

I barely slept last night. I'm not sure what the problem was, but I'm pretty sure I woke up at least once every hour in varying forms of discomfort, and consequently I've been rather tired today. Still, I made it through the day — and without sneaking off for a lunchtime nap, even — so now I feel justified in collapsing, ready for the weekend.

I'm still hoping to try doing a stream tomorrow, likely around lunchtime or early afternoon my time (UK time). I'm not going to make a huge effort to publicise it because I'll be using the session in part to make sure I've got everything figured out and set up properly, but if you do fancy stopping by and saying hello, my Twitch channel is right here.

UFO 50 still feels like a prime choice to stream. It's current, it's timely and it's thoroughly interesting. I'm only three games into it so far — I spent a hefty amount of time playing the second one this evening, and took a brief glimpse at the third one — but there's a hell of a lot to explore, and each game is substantial in its own distinctive way. The first game, Barbuta, which I wrote about here and made a video you can see below, was a solid arcade adventure affair in the mould of classic home computers; the next two are completely different.

As the existence of the above article and video implies, I'm going to do a full series on all the games in UFO 50, because it deserves that much, and I suspect there aren't going to be many other folks who explore it in that much detail. I've already seen a ton of ten-minute reviews go up on YouTube, and there is no way that they go into any sort of depth other than "retro game go brrr" so soon after release.

Sure, some folks probably just want a simple "is it worth buying?" but there's definitely scope here for some in-depth analysis. So that's what I'm going to do. On my own time. Because I like making work for myself.

Anyway, the second game is an interesting blend of strategy game and deckbuilder, then the third is an arcade-style autoscrolling platformer. Both of these are going to be a lot tougher to beat than Barbuta was, I can tell — those little gold trophies you get for beating all the games in the collection (and the cherries you get for beating them in extra special super pro ways) aren't going to come easy, it seems!

And that's good. I'm sure it must have been tempting for the team behind UFO 50 to make all the achievements and unlockables relatively straightforward, so everyone has a chance to see everything the game has to offer. But that's not how real retro games worked; real retro games were tough, because you often only had one or two of them, particularly if you were a console rather than a home computer player, and thus they needed to last you a while.

I'm not going to be too upset if I don't get all 50 shiny gold trophies and juicy cherries in UFO 50; I'll be satisfied if I've simply figured out how each game works and what you're supposed to do in it. Because that's the first real challenge in the package; determining what real games each title is a bit like — with their own unique twists — and getting to grips with their mechanics and structure.

I'm looking forward to playing some more, but for now, I think I need to go to bed and hopefully sleep a bit better than last night! Perhaps see you tomorrow for the stream?

If you want this nonsense in your inbox every day, please feel free to subscribe via email. Your email address won't be used for anything else.

#oneaday Day 104: A Plan

I think I might have a very good idea on what to do for a stream on Saturday. UFO 50 by Mossmouth (Derek Yu's software house, best known for Spelunky) came out recently, and hoo-whee, is it ever a good time.

Let me correct myself: I have spent approximately five hours this evening playing one of the 50 games in UFO 50. The first one. I have an idea brewing for a video and/or article series covering each and every game in the mix, so I'll save the specifics for when I kick that off, but suffice it to say for now that when they say this isn't a collection of microgames or minigames, they really mean it.

Let's back up a moment for those unfamiliar with UFO 50. It's a project that has been on the cards for quite some time — and was delayed by the development and release of Spelunky 2 — but now it's finally hit Steam. (Other platforms are apparently "TBC", so it's Steam or nothing for now.)

The concept behind it is that a hitherto-unknown game system from the '80s has been discovered, and you're taking a look at its library. Laid out in front of you are 50 disks for the system, each containing a game. It's your job to play them, as much or as little as you want.

Each of the games is designed in part as if it was running on technology of the '80s. That means low resolution pixel art, limited sound capabilities and a palette consisting of a whopping 32 possible colours. However, as a nod to modern accessibility, all of these games run in widescreen, which is something that wouldn't have been possible on the CRTs of yore, and annoying limitations from real systems like sprite limits causing flickering and suchlike are omitted. Essentially what we have here is a collection of "enhanced retro" games — games like you want to remember the '80s as being like, as opposed to what they actually were.

That said, the first game in the collection, Barbuta, which I've spent a lot of time on this evening, has very little in the way of sounds and is resolutely old-school in its punishing difficulty and deliberate obtuseness. I absolutely loved it because it feels like something you'd play on an '80s 8-bit micro, but I would completely understand if anyone bounced off this one hard. In UFO 50 "lore", this game dates back to 1982 and, outside of the deliberate enhancements mentioned above, it could absolutely pass for something from the period.

And no, there are no save states. If you want to beat one of these games, you have to do it as if you were using the real machine. That said, there is a mysterious "Terminal" function built in to UFO 50, which looks as if it might be the sort of thing you put Game Genie or Action Replay-style codes into, but I haven't figured anything out about that as yet. I'm not sure anyone has, but I'm sure some turbonerd on the Steam forums will have datamined it and spoiled it for everyone by the weekend.

Anyway, from my experience with just one of its 50 games, I can highly recommend UFO 50 so far. It's a fascinating way of looking at gaming history and the evolution of game design over time, plus simply a really interesting project. Making 50 worthwhile games and bundling them all together for just shy of 20 quid is quite an achievement, and the indie all-stars team behind it should be very pleased with what they have seemingly accomplished.

I'm looking forward to investigating further. I actually beat Barbuta after that five hours of playing and retrying this evening, so tomorrow I can move on to some of the other games! Looking forward to it a lot. And, as I said at the start, I think this seems like a great game to do some streaming with. So I will pencil it in for Saturday while my wife is out, and see how things go from there!

If you want this nonsense in your inbox every day, please feel free to subscribe via email. Your email address won't be used for anything else.