I’ve been playing Fire Emblem Engage since I finished Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door and The Legend of Zelda: Echoes of Wisdom, and I’ve been having a lovely time. Fire Emblem is a series that has always passed me by despite it being, in theory kind of in my wheelhouse.
I say “kind of” rather than “completely”, because while I absolutely love the high drama fantasy RPG side of the narrative, I’ve always had a bit of a rocky relationship with strategy games. I’m not good at them, see, and I’ve always had a hard time trying to determine how to get better at them. Because while there are plenty of guides out there for games like Fire Emblem, none of them simply sit you down and talk you through how to play them effectively. And that, for me, has always been a problem. It’s why I bounced off Fire Emblem Awakening on 3DS, the last entry in the series that I tried, and why I have held off on playing the copy of Fire Emblem: Three Houses that’s been on my shelf for several years at this point.
Why am I playing Fire Emblem Engage when Three Houses, a game almost universally considered to be superior in every way, is right there on my shelf? Well, because I had somehow got it in my head that Engage was a little more “straightforward” — and, perhaps more importantly, shorter. Three Houses is an absolute beast of a game, particularly if you do all the narrative routes (which I’m assured you should), whereas Engage is a once-and-done sort of affair, with replay value coming from the harder difficulty levels.
Mechanically, I don’t think Engage is any more straightforward than what I know of Three Houses. There are elements where it’s arguably more complicated, in fact — most notably with regard to the Emblem Bond and Skill Inheritance systems — but I wasn’t to know that going in, and I’m about 25 hours in now, so, well, I guess I’ve dealt with it successfully.
I’m not ashamed to admit that I’m playing on Normal difficulty and Casual mode — i.e. the one without permadeath. I was having enough difficulty with the initial missions in the game that adding the opportunity to completely gimp my playthrough via poor performance seemed like an unwise choice. I am new to the series, I am still finding my feet in how it all works and how to play effectively, and thus I want minimal barriers to just enjoying myself. The options are there, so I’m using them.
With that “guardrail” in place, Fire Emblem Engage is still quite challenging. If you lose a unit during a mission, you still have to do the rest of the mission without that unit, and that can really fuck you over. It took me a few early-game missions to figure out what I was doing wrong, but then something interesting happened: I figured out what I was doing wrong.
This is not something that normally happens with strategy games. I normally end up being trounced by whoever I’m playing against, then never wanting to play it again as a result — or, in the case of tabletop affairs, not getting much opportunity to “practice”. But with Fire Emblem Engage, I’ve ploughed on, and I’ve started to get a real feel for how the strategy works, and what is effective. I still make mistakes now and then — and the game’s generous “Draconic Time Crystal” mechanic that allows you to undo stupid moves has been very helpful here — but I am definitely getting better at How To Play Fire Emblem. And that’s a good feeling.
Because Being Able To Play Fire Emblem means that you can Enjoy Fire Emblem. And there is a lot to enjoy. The story of Engage, while relatively clichéd RPG fare — dark dragon long thought safely sealed away has come back, heroic band must gather a bunch of rings to summon enough power to drive the bastard back to the abyss — has been really compelling so far, and the character-centric nature of modern Fire Emblem is exactly what I like in this sort of game. I’m getting a real feeling that I’m getting to know the individual characters, both through the protagonist character’s interactions with them and their interactions with one another.
For the unfamiliar, modern Fire Emblem features a relationship mechanic whereby units can “support” one another by fighting alongside each other in combat and doing activities together between battles, and your reward for reaching a new milestone in two characters’ relationship with one another is a “support conversation”, which depicts the two of them getting to know one another. There’s not a Support mechanic in play for every pairing of characters in the game, but plenty that make logical sense, and it’s lovely to see everyone getting to know one another, having comedic misunderstandings and deepening their feelings of friendship.
Anyway. I’m not sure how far through the game I am — I reckon probably about halfway maybe? — but I’ve been playing it all weekend and having a great time. I should almost certainly have it finished ahead of Xenoblade Chronicles X coming out on Switch in March — because you better believe I’m revisiting that game thoroughly having adored it on Wii U — but in the meantime I think I’m a convert to the series. I’m sure longstanding fans will scoff at me playing on non-permadeath mode, but I bet all of them reload a save the second anyone dies anyway. Also it doesn’t matter how someone else enjoys a video game.
So yeah. Fire Emblem, pretty good. Who knew?
Want to read my thoughts on various video games, visual novels and other popular culture things? Stop by MoeGamer.net, my site for all things fun where I am generally a lot more cheerful. And if you fancy watching some vids on classic games, drop by my YouTube channel.
If you want this nonsense in your inbox every day, please feel free to subscribe via email. Your email address won’t be used for anything else.
Discover more from I'm Not Doctor Who
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
