1883: Social Justice, Public Shaming and Why I Want My Friends Back

I’m probably going to upset a few people with this post, but this is something that has been festering inside me for quite some time; something that I need to release by talking about it. I hope doing so will help me feel a little better, as well as make the people who care about me aware of the way certain increasingly prevalent attitudes in popular culture make me — and, I’m sure, others like me — feel.

I’ll kick off with an immediately contentious statement: I completely understand why the term “social justice warrior” is used as a pejorative.

I will immediately qualify this by saying that I do not think the concept of social justice is unimportant, nor that it is something that should be swept under the carpet and ignored. There are still problems with attitudes towards marginalised groups in society. There are still groups out there whose sole reason for existence is an irrational, burning hatred of certain people. There are subsets of passionate fans in all interest groups — be it video games, sports, movies, books, anything — who do not have a positive influence on the community as a whole.

However, I believe that for the most part, human beings are fundamentally decent people. I’ve met my share of assholes, sure, and seen evidence of people being mistreated, insulted and even threatened online — although, on that note, I will also say that we’re collectively a little hasty to jump to the descriptor “death threat” when it isn’t always particularly accurate. But I’ve also met enough decent people in my time in this world and on the Internet to find it difficult to believe that the world is the seething morass of hatred and prejudice that the most passionate advocates of social justice — the aforementioned “social justice warriors” — believe it is.

Let me clarify my earlier statement. The term “social justice warrior”, as I see it — and as many others see it, too — does not simply apply to anyone who believes in social justice, otherwise there would be no need for it; it would simply be a means of describing pretty much everyone who isn’t an asshole. Rather, it describes, as noted above, a particularly passionate and outspoken advocate for social justice — and someone who is not above using particularly unpleasant tactics to try and get their point across. Tactics like public shaming; insulting; “othering”; discrimination; ignoring opinions based on socioeconomic, ethnic, gender or sexuality groups; dogpiling… the list goes on, and, you’ll notice, these are all things that anyone who truly stands for social justice should really be against the use of, regardless of who they’re aimed at. A “social justice warrior” would discount my opinion on all this, for example, because I’m a white, straight, heterosexual, cissexual male: the very definition of the concept of “male privilege” that many of them cling to so very desperately.

Why is this a problem, though? It’s easy enough to ignore and filter out other bile-spewing groups based on hatred — when was the last time you accidentally stumbled across neo-Nazi ravings without deliberately going looking for them, for example? — so why not just tune out these people? Well, the answer to that is simple: unlike other hate-spewing groups, these loudmouths are increasingly infiltrating mainstream popular culture having positioned their approach as being “correct” from a moral perspective. My experience of them has largely been in the video games sector, but from what I understand, they’ve had a fair crack at numerous other communities over the last few years, too.

Let me explain why they bother me so much, and hopefully, my dislike of their tactics will become a little clearer.

A few years back, a games journo friend of mine — Jeff Grubb of GamesBeat — wrote a news story. I forget the exact details of the story (and can’t seem to find the original since GamesBeat’s numerous refreshes over the last few years), but it involved, as I recall, Twisted Metal creator David Jaffe making some contentious statements that involved the hypothetical punching of a woman in the face. Jaffe wasn’t advocating for violence against women, of course; doing something like that directly would be tantamount to career suicide; if I remember correctly, the context was something to do with playing multiplayer games and reactions to winning and losing. The details of the story itself are somewhat unimportant, anyway; what I’m really concerned with here is the reaction to it.

Jeff wrote the piece on Jaffe’s statements from a factual perspective — as a reporter, without editorialising. Different publications approach this sort of thing in different ways: more blog-style sites like Kotaku have no problem with their authors saying exactly what they think about a particular issue, whereas GamesBeat’s parent site VentureBeat is more of a business-centric publication that is less concerned with drama and more with simply reporting what has been going on.

Because Jeff didn’t condemn Jaffe’s statements in the article, however, he attracted the ire of an early incarnation of the “social justice warriors”. The situation became worse as he attempted to defend himself on Twitter; as time passed, more and more people, including high-profile games journalists with large followings, started attacking him — rather than Jaffe, who arguably should have been the subject of their ire, though even that’s debatable, given what I recall of the context surrounding his comments — and publicly shaming him, denouncing him as an “example of white male privilege” and effectively setting hordes of followers on him. I became seriously worried for his safety and wellbeing while this was going on.

This wasn’t an isolated incident, either. Numerous times over the last few years we’ve seen outspoken members of the industry with social justice leanings adopt the tactic of publicly shaming and bullying, even going so far as to threaten people with ending their career. Most recently, we’ve seen Polygon’s Ben Kuchera attacking a member of EA’s customer engagement team over the latter’s concern over community-made Twitter “blacklists”; in previous months we’ve seen the widely celebrated writer Leigh Alexander threatening to end people’s careers, feminist critic Mattie Brice throwing a hissy fit when someone called her out on a sexist joke and all manner of other atrocious behaviour. It simply isn’t acceptable.

All this isn’t to say that these people can’t voice their concerns. What I do find myself violently disliking about this culture of public shaming that has been growing over the last few years, however, is that there’s little to no “right of reply” in most cases. Once someone is branded as a misogynist, sexist, transphobe, racist or whatever by these self-appointed crusaders of morality, there’s no recovery from it. They have no opportunity to say “well, hang on a minute, here’s why you’re not quite right there…” and no opportunity to criticise the arguments being levelled against them. More often than not, critics of Kuchera, Alexander et al are swiftly blocked, silenced and/or mocked, simply because the “social justice warrior” position has been successfully positioned as the “correct” attitude. The same thing happens when anyone attempts to start a conversation surrounding feminist critic Anita Sarkeesian’s Tropes vs Women video series; while she does attract plenty of hate-filled bile — and that, let’s be clear, is always unacceptable — she and her team appear unwilling to engage with or discuss legitimate criticisms of her work, and often post deliberately provocative statements seemingly with the sole intention of drawing the trolls out to point and laugh at them.

Now, I’ve been standing on the sidelines throughout all of this. I have, thankfully, never been attacked by these people, even when I was working in the mainstream games press on GamePro and USgamer, even when I was writing about notoriously provocative and controversial games such as Senran Kagura and other titles from Japan. Perhaps I was just too small fry for industry “megaphones” (as Alexander calls herself) to bother with, and I’m not complaining; the fact I made a point of remaining positive while acknowledging these titles weren’t for everyone helped me build up a decent audience who appreciated the work I did, particularly as it was in stark contrast to the majority of other sites out there.

So why does all this bother me so much? Well, because it’s deeply, deeply frustrating, and because the culture of fear that these people are perpetuating online makes me very nervous about speaking on certain topics for fear of being ostracised. More important than that, however, is the feeling that it’s driven a wedge between me and a number of friends whom I no longer feel particularly comfortable talking to because I know they’ve drifted more towards the social justice side of the fence — or, in some cases, become outright zealots. I miss those friends greatly, and it makes me extremely sad that I can’t talk to them any more simply because I don’t share their ideological viewpoint — or, rather, I do, but I fundamentally disagree with the methods through which they go about expressing that viewpoint.

What should people do instead? Simple. Champion the things that you’re fond of and believe in, without putting down other people for what they enjoy. Diversity isn’t just about creating experiences that “everyone” can enjoy, though that’s part of it. Diversity is also about creating experiences that appeal to specific audiences. There’s nothing wrong with that; in fact, it makes for more interesting, more focused pieces of entertainment that feel personal and relatable. Cater to men, women, heterosexual people, homosexual people, cissexual people, transgender or transsexual people, white people, black people, Asian people, anyone you like. Accept that some things are not “for” you — though that doesn’t need to stop you from finding enjoyment in them, as the number of otome games I’ve enjoyed over the last few years will attest — and celebrate the things that are. If you believe that there aren’t enough works catering to the groups you consider yourself to fall into, throw your support behind those that do or even make your own. Just, for God’s sake, don’t ever position yourself as The One Correct Attitude and point the finger of shame at anyone who doesn’t fall within your own specific worldview, because that’s where the majority of this nonsense is coming from.

I’m not a misogynist. I’m not a sexist. I’m not a racist. I’m not a transphobe. I’m not even an anti-feminist or a men’s rights advocate. I just want these “social justice warriors” to understand that what they are doing is not, in fact, championing diversity; it’s stifling conversation and creating a culture of mistrust between developers, players and press — and between friends.

hate it. And I wish it would go away. And I want my friends back.


Discover more from I'm Not Doctor Who

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

7 thoughts on “1883: Social Justice, Public Shaming and Why I Want My Friends Back

  1. I’ve become one of those people who has an issues with the term “social justice warrior” being used as an insult, although I don’t take that position for the same reason as many others who do. I simply think it’s a case of missing the forest through the trees, and associating these people with the rather noble idea of social justice is injurious to the philosophy itself. There’s a much simpler term for these people, and they rise to fill the shoes more and more each day. They’re bullies, and that’s what they should be called.

    1. Exactly right. And that, I think, is the crux of all this and why it bothers me so much. I’ve suffered bullying throughout my life; I thought I’d left it behind with high school, but recent experiences in particular have led me to think otherwise.

      This is not the world an advocate of social justice should be building.

    2. There’s something particularly insufferably to me about people who seemingly spend half of their day on Twitter yet triumphantly self-identity as “social justice warriors.” I don’t think you should be able to call yourself a “social justice warrior” if you spend vastly more time fuming about video game character designs on Twitter than you spend actively making the world a better place (by, for example, doing volunteer work or getting involved in organizations). I know I don’t do enough of the latter, and I think it would be insulting to those who do to give myself that label.

      It’s not entirely fair to make this about class, but I think it’s telling that so many of the loudest social justice bullies are the kind of upper-middle-class white people who had the luxury to grow up around video games and had the luxury to pursue a career writing about video games. An odd quality of the GG stuff is the palpable sense that the supposedly-privileged misogynerds are less wealthy and more diverse than the people attacking them. That’s a huge generalization and one for which there are many exceptions, of course, but it’s striking nonetheless.

  2. Pete, I like you, and I know you to be a very sensitive gentleman, and so I will try to be as careful as I can about this.

    When someone tells you that you did or said something racist, it is NOT the same thing as telling you that you ARE racist. Or sexist or whatever. This is a distinction that many, many people have great difficulty with, on all sides of the discussion. And if we are to move together toward a better world, it is absolutely essential that we learn this distinction, and learn it well.
    Try this:

    http://www.alternet.org/culture/why-white-people-freak-out-when-theyre-called-out-about-race

    The next time you feel bullied, stop and take a step back. Did the person tell you that you did something offensive, or that you are offensive? If it’s the former, look at what you did, and if they’re right, acknowledge it and take the experience as an opportunity to get better at the difficult skill of being good. If it’s the latter, then either disengage, or (if you have the energy and think they might benefit from the exchange), admit to what you said or did, and tell them that you are trying your best, and that their accusations, though heartfelt, are not helping to make things better. Maybe link them to that video above.

    Speaking as a fellow straight white able-bodied cisgendered male, I sympathize with your struggle. But the most vulnerable among us have been lied to and taken advantage of by genuinely sexist, racist douchebags and used as cannon fodder in their war against diversity. Those assholes have pointed you at their enemies, pointed you at women, nonwhites, queerfolk, transfolk and so on and told you that they are trying to take your stuff.

    Don’t go for it. Don’t be a footsoldier in their war. Don’t let them use you.
    You’re better than them. Take up the challenge, knowing that you will fail sometimes. It’s worth it. I promise. I know. I’ve been where you are.

  3. As usual your common sense approach, your clear thinking, and your articulation is remarkable. Your solution paragraph : “What should people do instead? Simple. …” is particularly measured, concise, grounded with no condescensions or disparagements. In my view this article should be picked up by the media and heralded as the voice of reason.
    Our world is being taken over and reduced by aggression in so many forms. It has been made an uncomfortable world in which to live. Enjoyment has almost been sucked out of it by the disapproving minority. There are so may pleasures to experience natural and created – land and sea scapes, art, music, literature, dance and sport of all kinds. Why fill our lives with negativity, argument, discord. Champion our differences, merge and meld them instead of creating huge divides. As John Lennon wrote and sang – ‘Imagine all the people living as one’.
    Stay strong, trust in your belief that the majority are decent, respectful people who probably feel the same way about our poor world and unnecessarily stressful lifestyles that seem to be dictated to us by others. And continue to quietly be the voice of reason.

  4. Also, if you’d like to see why some of those social justice-types seem so very angry), you might take a look at this:
    http://www.ravishly.com/2015/02/25/anne-theriault-trolling-conversation-mother-online-bullying

    If you do read that article (it’s short), you might find yourself thinking of the word “bullying” in a somewhat different way.

    And the most heartbreaking thing of all? It happens every day. All the time. This is what makes people want to be warriors.

  5. You’ve really hit the nail on the head. Why does something (or someone) have to be banned for a person to be comfortable? The world can’t become completely just by banning everything that makes anyone uncomfortable, it’s impossible to avoid. People are getting trapped in logical fallacies, and their own anger and suffering.

    You can either focus on what hurts you, or focus on what enriches you and the people you care about; hopefully those who bully in the name of social justice will eventually learn that. Nobody has a free pass to hurt others just because they’ve been hurt, it makes life miserable for themselves and those around them.

Comments are closed.