1381: The Hand You’re Dealt

There’s been a whole load of drama recently surrounding resolutions — exactly what resolutions PS4 and Xbox One games will run at; the fact that Deadly Premonition for PC only runs at 720p; the fact that Typing of the Dead renders at 720p even if you set its resolution to 1080p — and I find it very difficult to care.

I mean, sure, I acknowledge and accept the fact that if you’ve spent a thousand quid or more on a PC — or bought a brand-new next-gen console, for that matter — many people want everything they play to take full advantage of their hardware and look as good as possible… but if it doesn’t, I just shrug my shoulders and move on. It ultimately doesn’t matter; I can think of very few situations where technical deficiencies have significantly impacted my experience to such a degree that something becomes unplayable or even that word that NeoGAF appears to enjoy throwing around: “unacceptable”. (The last was Guild Wars 2, and that was an extreme case; something the game doesn’t like about my particular system configuration makes it run at about 5 frames per second, which really is unplayable.)

I wonder if part of the reason I feel like this is the fact that I’ve spent a significant proportion of time over the past few years playing games that aren’t at the technological forefront. I’ve played a lot of pixel-art indie games, for example, but I’ve also played low-poly stuff, games from the early 3D era, games on PS2, handheld games and even low-budget PS3 games. Hell, three of my favourite games in recent memory — the Hyperdimension Neptunia series — are some of the most technically flawed titles I’ve played for a while, struggling to reach even 30 frames per second at a resolution that I’m pretty certain is not 1080p.

It could also be the fact that I grew up with PCs that weren’t always the most powerful or the best and as such quickly learned how to optimise detail settings for a good balance between looking good and running smoothly. I remember playing Doom on a 386 and finding that balance; that said, I also remember us getting a 486 and it being like a completely different game.

Yes, it’s lovely when something looks beautiful and animates smoothly to boot — one of the best things about upgrading or replacing your PC is trying out something that brought your previous system to its knees and seeing that it runs butter-smooth — but it really doesn’t spoil my day in the slightest if something doesn’t run at 60 or even 30 frames per second. It’s just not something that matters to me in the slightest. For me, the important thing is the actual game itself: is it fun? Is it emotionally engaging? Do I like the characters? Am I enjoying the experience? Do I want to talk about it to friends? Whether or not I can give positive answers to any or all of those questions, “does it run at 60 frames per second?” is not something that even enters my mind at any point.

Note: I’m not saying you shouldn’t care about 60 frames per second or 1080p or whatever — it’s your decision what to care about, of course. I’m simply giving my take on all this — and it transpires that I don’t really give a shit about it at all. I’m happy just to play a new Typing of the Dead, or Deadly Premonition on PC, or… you get the idea.


Discover more from I'm Not Doctor Who

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.